|
|||||||||
Helping Companies Rethink, Recover & Refocus on the FutureCall John Grubbs (903) 295-7400 |
|||||||||
In the fast-paced world of leadership, performance gets credit as the ultimate metric for success. Yet, a pressing dilemma persists: What happens when a high-performing individual wreaks havoc on the team's morale and cohesion? Many leaders, mesmerized by the short-term gains of retaining a "toxic star," overlook the long-term damage inflicted on the collective. This article explores the phenomenon of leaders keeping toxic high performers, the underlying psychology behind this tendency, and actionable strategies to address it. By fostering a healthier team culture, leaders can unlock sustainable success that benefits everyone—not just the star performer. The Seductive Allure of the Toxic High Performer At first glance, it's easy to see why leaders cling to toxic high performers. These individuals often deliver exceptional results, solve problems quickly, or generate profits that bolster the organization's bottom line. Their productivity can overshadow any interpersonal issues—at least temporarily. But beneath the surface, their behavior creates ripple effects that undermine the team's psychological safety and trust. Toxic stars may engage in gossip, bullying, or manipulation. They might take credit for others' work or blame teammates for failures. The result? A workplace plagued by fear, resentment, and disengagement. Studies consistently show that team members in such environments experience burnout, reduced creativity, and higher turnover rates. Worse, the damage often goes unnoticed until it becomes severe, as the leader's focus remains fixed on the toxic performer's outcomes rather than their methods. Why Leaders Fall into This Trap The decision to retain a toxic high performer often stems from subconscious beliefs and social dynamics. Leaders may feel they need to tolerate the behavior because:
The True Cost of Toxicity While the toxic individual may excel, their behavior often discourages others from striving for excellence. Why work harder when the rewards seem to go to someone who disrupts rather than uplifts the group? Over time, this can erode... |
|||||||||